对我国生物医学和实验动物科学及科研伦理工作边界的认识和建议
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京大学医学部实验动物科学部,北京 100191;2.北京大学医学部基础医学院生理学与病理生理学系,北京 100191

中图分类号:

R-33


Suggestions for the institutions and laboratory animal units and scientific community in China
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Peking University Health Sciences Center, Beijing 100191, China. 2. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medcine, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • | | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于现代医学和实验动物科学发展长期遭受动物福利权益主义势力羁绊影响的历史和现状,结合我国的相关现实情况,呼吁和建议我国实验动物工作者、使用实验动物的科研工作者思考辨识我们的专业工作边界:第一,不组织不参与源于动物福利权益主义倡导的所谓世界动物日或实验动物日活动;第二,不组织不参与源于日本特殊鬼神文化相关的所谓动物慰灵碑活动。这两种活动与生物医学、实验动物科学及科研伦理的专业内容无任何交集,本质上是反医学和反对实验动物科学的,更与中华传统文化格格不入。第三,坚持医学和实验动物科学发展观,辨别动物福利权益主义观点主张,厘清与民间动物福利权益活动的界限,推进实验动物使用与管理及科研伦理工作科学化,支持我国生物医学研究发展。

    Abstract:

    Based on the development history that the modern medicine and laboratory animal science have long been hindered by animal welfare groups and animal-rights activists in Western countries, and considering the relevant circumstance in China, the author appeals and recommends that the laboratory animal practitioners and biomedical researchers, the scientific community in China should recognize and identify the boundaries of our professional activities. Firstly, do not participate in the activity related to so called “World (Lab) Animal Day” that is said in some Chinese websites, to originate from NAVS, an antivivisection society Ltd. , London. Secondly, do not participate in the activity related to so called “animal memorial stone” that was originated in Japan. These movements have nothing to do with biomedicine and laboratory animal sciences, and fundamentally are antiscientific and are incompatible to traditional Chinese culture. Thirdly, distinguish the standpoints of laboratory animal science from various viewpoints of animal welfare/ rights activists, promote scientific management of the institutional animal care and use for better supporting biomedical research in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

徐国恒.对我国生物医学和实验动物科学及科研伦理工作边界的认识和建议[J].中国比较医学杂志,2024,34(1):114~120.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:211
  • 下载次数: 1067
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-31
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-04
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭